Transparency in Workload

Numerous faculty groups began initiating conversations around transparency of workload procedures leading the Office of the Provost to request each school, department, and unit operationalize the previously established University-wide policy on workload (Faculty Workload and Compensation Policy 2.7) into clear and transparent guidelines that were contextualized within each area. The assumptions underlying this request included an understanding that teaching expectations, research and creative activity, and service loads will likely differ by discipline and should be grounded in local norms, values, and discussions. The launch of this work in 2020 began a five-year effort to create sustainable and transparent procedures for faculty and academic leadership to use in balancing contributions across teaching, scholarship/creative activity and service.

Our Mission

The mission of Transparency in Workload is to create sustainable and transparent procedures for faculty and academic leadership to use in balancing contributions across teaching, scholarship/creative activity, and service.

Faculty at conference table holding a meeting

Transparency in Workload Timeline

A multi-year project, 色花堂_色花堂 98堂 seeks to increase transparency of faculty workload procedures. Below, is a timeline of the University-wide efforts:


Initial conversations began around transparency of workload procedures across campus leading the Office of the Provost to request all schools, departments, and units to develop workload procedures in collaboration with their leadership and faculty and in alignment with the Faculty Workload and Compensation Policy 2.7. Each unit developed discipline-specific procedures.

All discipline-specific workload procedures were reviewed and adopted. Some units began to use the procedures in their annual activity reporting cycle. A survey was developed and disseminated to all faculty requesting feedback on their level of involvement with the development and implementation of the procedures and on their ideas about University-level service demands. A report from the survey results was shared with all faculty, which can be found in the resources links below.

Based on survey results, Provost Elizabeth G. Loboa asked the deans to appoint an academic leader from their schools to participate in the Transparency in Workload Group with the Office of Faculty Success and University Decision Support. This group met monthly to develop a standard form for reporting faculty in-load. The form was used in the Faculty Activity Reporting cycle. A second survey was administered in early April to gather faculty feedback.

Each school and college worked on responding to the faculty feedback that had been gathered during the Year Three Survey. They revised areas of the workload policies in which faculty requested more clarity, specificity, and transparency. Departments were asked to conduct an inventory of how workload is being differentiated, as recommended by the American Council on Education (ACE), to ensure an even distribution of effort across research/creative activity, teaching and service. Schools developed a report of these two efforts for the Provost and again submitted the standardized faculty in-load report.

Anticipated goals for the final project year will include a request for all units to revisit their workload procedures and make constructive revisions based on the iterative cycles of faculty feedback gathered over the previous years of implementation. A final Year Five Survey will gather faculty feedback on ways in which this overarching effort impacted greater transparency in distributing service load and in differentiating workload to support research/creative activity and balanced teaching loads.


Group Membership List

  • Bill Dillon ([email protected]), Senior Associate Dean and Herman W. Lay Professor of Marketing; Cox School of Business
  • Tom Carr ([email protected]), Associate Professor of Mathematics; Dedman College of Humanities and Sciences
  • Molly Ellis ([email protected]), Director of Strategic Faculty Initiatives; Office of the Provost
  • Francesca Go ([email protected]), Assistant Dean of Assessment and Accreditation; Simmons School of Education and Human Development
  • Derek Kompare ([email protected]), Associate Dean for Faculty; Meadows School of the Arts
  • Hugo Magallanes ([email protected]), Associate Dean for Academic Affairs; Perkins School of Theology
  • Tom Mayo ([email protected]), Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs; Dedman School of Law
  • Dinesh Rajan ([email protected]), Senior Associate Dean; Lyle School of Engineering
  • Sarah Sage ([email protected]), Director for Strategy & Operations; Office of the Provost
  • Michael Tumeo ([email protected]), Director for University Decision Support; Office of the Provost
  • Paige Ware ([email protected]), Associate Provost for Faculty Success; Office of the Provost

 

Get Involved